Single Slit Diffraction



" Physics is really nothing more than a search for ultimate simplicity, but so far all we have is a kind of elegant messiness.”
Bill Bryson, A Short History of Nearly Everything

eqn1

fig1                               fig4
eqn4

where ω is the angular frequency of the wave and Δφ is the phase angle.  The relationship between phase angle and path difference Δs is given by
eqn2

From the diagram at right the path difference Δs, relative to the center, is given by ysinθ.  In this case
eqn3

so that the total electric field at a point on the screen is obtained by integration over the slit

eqn5

Performing this integration we obtain
eqn6
where eqn7

eqn8

ssdifffig5

eqn1
as expected.

  • exclamation For n = 0 above, θ = 0, but the intensity function leads to the central maximum.
  • exclamation Note that the width of the central maximum - 2λ/a - is double that of secondary maxima - λ/a.  This is in contrast to the double slit interference pattern where all maxima have the same width.
  • exclamation The location of the secondary maxima are given approximately by 
eqn9
The exact position of these maxima is shifted slightly towards smaller θ.
  • In the above analysis we have (implicitly) assumed that the source and observation screen are infinitely far from the single slit (on opposite sides of the slit).  This allows us to use the plane wave approximation leading to the intensity expression above.  This is described as Fraunhofer fraunhoferdiffraction.  Practically we can approximate a Fraunhofer situation by using converging lenses to produce parallel rays.
  • Without assuming plane waves we must resort to a more complex analysis known as fresnelFresnel diffraction.



  The Official Unabashed Scientific Dictionary defines a transistor as a nun who's had a sex change


 

Dr. C. L. Davis
Physics Department
University of Louisville
email: c.l.davis@louisville.edu