pew
/
fuslontable
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
fuslontable/data/1xKrPtpcOss1SSyxHGP7sBH5q57...

231 lines
23 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Normal View History

save the tables
2019-12-03 20:41:57 -05:00
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
<title>New Table - Google Fusion Tables</title>
<style type="text/css">
html, body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 100%;
}
</style></head>
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Matt Hort<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Valencia Farmer’s Market<br>
<b>Location:</b> Valencia and 24th Street, San Francisco, 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> I think the only the only thing we’re losing is a gas station. My concern is about not having gas stations. I notice all the gas stations we have are going away. I haven’t seen a ton of construction. We’ve been here for 30 years, neighborhood has become like another totally different neighborhood. <br>
<b>Icon:</b> ltblu_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Equivocal
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Ada Almendarez<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Employee at Casa de Salud<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3203 24th Street San Francisco 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> They should continue building --it stops criminals. I’ve been here 20 years and I see customers complain because landlords don’t remodel, so rent-increases are normal.
It has improved a lot. Valencia Street is nice. Most of my clients have already moved to Santa Rosa, San Rafael. I don’t live in the Mission... Latinos don’t really live here anymore, sometimes they come to my shop from Tracy, Fresno…Most people from this area, have already moved. Some people don’t like it because of the raise in rent, but for me, more housing is better, cleaner, there’s new people. New apartments help improve the neighborhood overall.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> grn_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> For
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Adam Sad<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Manager Big Mouth Burgers, lived in San Francisco for seven years.<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3392 24th St, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> Over here there isn’t a ton of construction, yet… There’s good reasons and bad reasons for new construction. Yeah, maybe we shouldn’t have gas station in residential area. But the bad is that it’s going to be expensive. With the construction in the neighborhood it has been a pain to find parking, if they build new construction they should be concerned about that. They change all the atmosphere in the neighborhood. Is it good? I don’t think so. Yes, it’s good if it will help a lot of people, but new renters aren’t going to be people who live here. We should stop it if it’s just to make money off the neighborhood.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> ltblu_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Equivocable
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Craig Zaretsky<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Owner Campfire Gallery, 20 year resident of San Francisco.
<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3344 24th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> If we’re talking about those cookie cutter condos, I don’t like those. I don’t have much positive to say about those. A lot of charm, a lot of character is stripped away by modern architecture--that’s even a compliment to call it modern! There’s plenty of housing being made for people who can spend a $100,000 a year on rent, but what about people who can’t afford that? Like a lot of other things, there’s not enough regulation--just like internet companies…. I don’t agree that adding more supply will be good for everyone. It’s just one specific demographic that gets served. It doesn’t support broader range of people, it limits diversity, when you get these big developments. I’ve been here for 20 years, came during first dot com boom, it’s always been expensive. It’s tricky for me because I benefit as business owner, but I don’t want to see more big developments.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Gloria Esteva<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Shopkeeper, former Mission Resident<br>
<b>Location:</b> 24th and Mission Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> I think a moratorium would be good. It’s a double-edged sword. Lack of housing can be an excuse [to continue building], but if there is nothing else but expensive housing? What they built by Arriba Juntos [Mission and 15th] ––impossible! And, for merchants [on the first floor] they have to be very elegant to rent there… We can’t be told that building more is the answer, because there won’t be space anyways for poor people. And, the Mayor loves money. <br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Carmelita Elías<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Owner of Mejor Bakery for 22 years<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3329 24th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> Change has always been like this. The people building are investors, they are rich and building for the rich. There is no middle class anymore. They come in, buy blocks of housing and invest --they take people out. When building, the law says they have to give an indemnization to people [that are already living there], and then they prefer to not rent it out to people that will stay there long-term because then they have to ask them to leave. And, the commercial spaces below… no one is giving leases for longer than three years on Mission Street anymore.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Cosmin Haims<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Employee at Vapory Shop<br>
<b>Location:</b> 2707 Folsom St, San Francisco, CA 94105<br>
<b>Text:</b> More construction means more gentrification. It’s bittersweet you’ll never please everyone… We’re so flush with new business already, so it’s not like we need more business. If there’s ways to lower crime rate, bring more jobs, and bring housing that’s affordable… but that’s a hard problem to solve.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> ltblu_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Equivocal
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Diana Medina<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Owner of Diju Jewelry <br>
<b>Location:</b> 3247 24th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> I’m not opposed to building more, but a limit would be good as long as it doesn’t affect the neighborhood. To charge up to $5,000 a month? We are not millionaires. If tech is boosting all this, why don’t they build residential developments outside the city? When they do it here, everyone is affected.
That they will build affordable housing where there is market rate is a hoax. First, they will raise the rent and once they build, we’ll be left out. These are corporations and they don’t care that Latinos are leaving and that the neighborhood is changing. As a merchant, I provide a good service and I have a lot of American [white] customers, about 80%. But, I already have that customer base, and not all the businesses can survive.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Ricardo Peña<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Owner Mixcoatl, lived in the Mission for 25 years<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3201 24th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> It’s okay that there is a limit in construction in neighborhoods where poor people live. To build more it’s a move from real estate developers to build more and create more housing...These are luxury apartments, and for what? Nobody born in San Francisco will be able to afford it. It’s for people that come from other countries, or other parts of the country that want to live here. And, there is no affordability, not even to buy. So, yes, there should be a moratorium. <br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Denise Gonzalez<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Owner Luna de Luz, lived in San Francisco for 30 years<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3182 24th St, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> When you build more, it’s good for people… but nature of this neighborhood, it’s going to change. Rents are extremely high, we don’t want neighborhood to change so much. It’s already such an expensive place to live, it’s going to push us out. Let’s keep things simple. I like the old buildings. Look at the building on Mission and 22nd, it’s too new, why not make it look more like other things. We have these beautiful streets, trees, flowers. I don’t want big buildings like downtown.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Chris Dixon<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Owner Explorist International, lived in San Francisco for 18 year<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3174 24th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> If it’s a blanket moratorium, it can’t be a 100% good thing. There are things that’s needed in the neighborhood, a lot of unused buildings or disused properties. Obviously knocking down La Parilla to build new condos isn’t great. All that stuff that’s nasty, crappily built and super expensive it’s going to be rundown in 20 years… But moratorium seems like too much. There’s a lot of rundown buildings that need to be demolished and rebuilt, but it feels like some of the new stuff is just wanton construction. It’s just like in the late 90s when they were building all these live-work spaces for young, new people, but by the time they were done, everybody was gone… It just isn’t all black and white.
<br>
<b>Icon:</b> ltblu_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Equivocal
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Marta Espinoza<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Waitress at Sun Rise Restaurant, lived in Mission for 15 years <br>
<b>Location:</b> 3126 24th St
San Francisco, CA<br>
<b>Text:</b> It’s not good for people who live in this area. They’re making expensive condos, but most people can’t pay to live in them. People who live here have to leave. <br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Twee Goule<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Manager at Delicateses La Plaza<br>
<b>Location:</b> 2598 Folsom St
San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> I much prefer a building than an old lot. The problem is we don’t have enough housing. I think we should build more and that old place [Charyn Auctions] is horrible.
They should build more, when more competition grows price will go down. If we have more apartments there will be less pressure on market. Gentrification happens everywhere. A hundred years ago on Union Street, it wasn’t that fancy. I’m not afraid of changes… We need places to sleep, places to live. (Laughs) You won’t find many people like me!<br>
<b>Icon:</b> grn_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> For
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Louis Hermosillo<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Mission resident for 23 years.<br>
<b>Location:</b> 23rd and Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> New development is good, don’t get me wrong, but when you’re pushing people out, that’s a problem… This neighborhood has changed 100%.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> ltblu_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Equivocal
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Rafael Hernandez<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Mission resident for 30 years<br>
<b>Location:</b> 2609 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> They charge too much for rent. We can’t live here, we can’t live in this city anymore.
You can see it everywhere, everywhere all over the city there’s too many people, too much construction.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Isaac Muhawih<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Owner Isaac's Market<br>
<b>Location:</b> 2601 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> There’s too much construction… It’s good for business, but I don’t care, it’s just too much. There is a housing shortage, sure, but it could be better for people who live here.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Will Fox<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> San Francisco resident for five years<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3101 24th St
San Francisco, CA<br>
<b>Text:</b> Seems foolish to limit infrastructure. As the city grows, infrastructure has to grow with it. If you want to see the rainbow, you’ve got to see some rain… San Francisco is at an interesting juncture. If I live in a rent-controlled apartment and if I said no to new developments, it seems shortsighted. City can’t totally control what kind of apartments gets built. I understand things need to get built, but no one is going to build reasonably priced apartments, given how much things are going for. People are adverse to density, I understand, I benefit from it, but pulling out the stoppers doesn’t seem sustainable, it’s short sighted protectionism. I’ve always enjoyed 24th Street, because it strikes a balance, this place feels kind of steady. I don’t know if this will be helped by construction, but at the same time, no one should be able not to live where they want to live because there’s no housing.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> grn_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> For
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Natasha Matthews<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> San Francisco resident for 33 years, employee and San Francisco Friends School<br>
<b>Location:</b> 2800 Mission Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> I like a lot of the new construction. If they’re building apartments that are affordable for people and not pushing people out, that’s good. I support all the new construction if it’s beneficial for residents, if it’s bringing in business and creating jobs. With the new construction at 22nd and Valencia, I thought: Oh these are cool, but I wonder is it pushing people out? What’s considered affordable most residents can’t afford. <br>
<b>Icon:</b> ltblu_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Equivocal
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> 1298 Valencia<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Preliminary Plans<br>
<b>Location:</b> 1298 Valencia Street, San Francisco, CA<br>
<b>Text:</b> Currently one of the Mission's few gas stations, this corner could get 35 units of new housing if the plans are approved by the Planning Department.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> buildings<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b>
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Grace Avila<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Owner of Paris Perfume<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3245 24th St, San Francisco,CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> I don’t have much to say, it’s going to be very different with all these buildings. Many are going to have to close their business when a new buildings go in. I think it can be bad for economy of area. I think a slow down is good. Sure we have housing problem, but developers that want to do it on 24th Street are doing it more for economic reasons… For businesses, it’s very bad. We have many customers that come in here looking for their favorite perfume, but they’ve all moved outside the city. If they go away, they’re less likely to come here. They live in Oakland, Richmond, and other places. We’re having that problem.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> ltblu_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Equivocal
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> El Bates<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Mission resident for 12 years.<br>
<b>Location:</b> Capp Street and 24th, San Francisco, CA<br>
<b>Text:</b> I don’t want too many of these new buildings. They’ve been driving people out of here. I like the older look, don’t like this new stuff.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> orange_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Against
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Jimmy Dominguez<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Bay Area native, lived in San Francisco for ten years.<br>
<b>Location:</b> 24th Street and Folsom, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> Rents aren’t going to go down unless there’s more construction, but it sucks. It feels like your neighborhood is going away. I think everyone acknowledges we need more housing, but who is it for? You see what low income housing brings, but you also see what kind of people luxury housing brings. Twenty-fourth street is special, it’s my favorite street in the city… Everything you see going up is awful, look at Vida, which sucks. Everybody has a lot of complaints but no one has solutions.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> ltblu_blank<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b> Equivocal
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> 1198 Valencia Street<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Preliminary Plans<br>
<b>Location:</b> 1198 Valencia Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> Mixed-use housing development to replace vacant lot. If approved by the Planning Department, it would bring 42 units to this corner. <br>
<b>Icon:</b> buildings<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b>
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> 2918 Mission Street<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Preliminary Plans<br>
<b>Location:</b> 2918 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> If approved by the Planning Department, plans at this address would demolish an existing laundromat to make room for 38 new units of housing.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> buildings<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b>
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> 1515 South Van Ness<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Preliminary Plans <br>
<b>Location:</b> 1515 South Van Ness, San Francisco CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> There are big plans for this site which currently holds the offices of McMillan Electric. If approved, this project would bring 160 units of new housing, 19 of them would be affordable. <br>
<b>Icon:</b> buildings<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b>
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Vida's Land<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Land Dedicated for Affordable Housing<br>
<b>Location:</b> 1296 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> As part of its compliance with affordable housing law, Vida condos gave this parcel to the city to create 44-units of affordable housing. No timeline yet as to when this project will get developed.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> buildings<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b>
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> 3085 24th Street<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Preliminary Plans<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3085 24th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> This project would demolish the existing La Parilla Grill to make way for 20 units of new housing.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> buildings<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b>
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> Casa de la Misión<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Affordable Housing<br>
<b>Location:</b> 3011 24th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> This project by the Mission Neighborhoods Centers will bring 32 units of low-income and senior housing. It's been approved and construction should begin sometime in the next year. <br>
<b>Icon:</b> buildings<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b>
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> 2675 Folsom Street<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Preliminary Plans<br>
<b>Location:</b> 2675 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> Plans to construct a five-story, mixed use building at the location of Charyn's Restaurant Auction would bring 115 new units of housing, 17 of them would be affordable.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> buildings<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b>
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
<b>Name:</b> 2600 Harrison Street<br>
<b>Chiron:</b> Preliminary Plans<br>
<b>Location:</b> 2600 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
<b>Text:</b> This project, if approved, would demolish Western Plywood to make way for 20 new units of affordable housing.<br>
<b>Icon:</b> buildings<br>
<b>Opinion on Development:</b>
</div></td></tr></table></body></html>