170 lines
11 KiB
HTML
170 lines
11 KiB
HTML
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
|
||
|
|
<title>s9008_court_merged - Google Fusion Tables</title>
|
||
|
|
<style type="text/css">
|
||
|
|
html, body {
|
||
|
|
margin: 0;
|
||
|
|
padding: 0;
|
||
|
|
height: 100%;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
</style></head>
|
||
|
|
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 1<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that Panhandle districts 1 and 3 -- which span the length of several counties -- do not comply with a requirement that districts be compact.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Don Gaetz, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 10<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The Orlando-area district, which includes the home of Majority Leader Sen. Andy Gardiner, R-Orlando, includes an "appendage" that is connected to the rest of the district by a strip of land less than half a mile wide.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Andy Gardiner, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 11<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Alan Hays, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 12<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 13<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> David Simmons, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 14<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 15<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Jim Norman, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 16<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 17<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Jack Latvala, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 18<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Thad Altman, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 19<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Arthenia L. Joyner, D
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 2<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Charles S. Charlie Dean, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 20<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 21<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Ronda Storms, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 22<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 23<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Lizbeth Benacquisto, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 24<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 25<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Joe Negron, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 26<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 27<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 28<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Nancy C. Detert, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 29<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> Two more sister districts that the court says are not compact. The court also found that District 29 is too similar to its previous configuration, which would benefit Sen. Ellyn Bogdanoff, R-Fort Lauderdale.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Ellyn Setnor Bogdanoff, R and Maria Lorts Sachs, D
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 3<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that Panhandle districts 1 and 3 -- which span the length of several counties -- do not comply with a requirement that districts be compact.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Greg Evers, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 30<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court called the sprawling Southwest Florida district an "upside-down alligator" that is not compact; it overwhelmingly favors incumbent Sen. Garrett Richter, R-Naples.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Garrett Richter, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 31<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Jeremy Ring, D
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 32<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 33<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Rene Garcia, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 34<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> Two more sister districts that the court says are not compact. The court also found that District 29 is too similar to its previous configuration, which would benefit Sen. Ellyn Bogdanoff, R-Fort Lauderdale.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Christopher L. Chris Smith, D
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 35<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Gwen Margolis, D
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 36<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Eleanor Sobel, D
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 37<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Miguel Diaz de la Portilla, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 38<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Oscar Braynon II, D
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 39<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Anitere Flores, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 4<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 40<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 5<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Bill Montford, D
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 6<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The seats were drawn to protect the minority status of District 6, a solid Democratic seat that includes the home of Sen. Audrey Gibson, D-Jacksonville. The court said the Senate went too far, however, drawing oddly shaped districts for Gibson and in District 9, around the home of Sen. John Thrasher, R-St. Augustine.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Audrey Gibson, D
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 7<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> Steve Oelrich, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 8<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The court found that this district was not unconstitutionally drawn.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> None
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
||
|
|
<b>District:</b> 9<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Court's findings:</b> The seats were drawn to protect the minority status of District 6, a solid Democratic seat that includes the home of Sen. Audrey Gibson, D-Jacksonville. The court said the Senate went too far, however, drawing oddly shaped districts for Gibson and in District 9, around the home of Sen. John Thrasher, R-St. Augustine.<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Incumbent:</b> John Thrasher, R
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr></table></body></html>
|