District name: Senate District 1
2010 population: 424,456
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -45,577
Percentage difference: -9.7%

District name: Senate District 10
2010 population: 565,921
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +95,888
Percentage difference: 20.4%

District name: Senate District 11
2010 population: 433,661
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -36,372
Percentage difference: -7.7%

District name: Senate District 12
2010 population: 531,959
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +75,052
Percentage difference: 13.2%

District name: Senate District 13
2010 population: 394,766
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -75,267
Percentage difference: -16%

District name: Senate District 14
2010 population: 457,489
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -12,544
Percentage difference: -2.7%

District name: Senate District 15
2010 population: 560,770
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +90,737
Percentage difference: 19.3%

District name: Senate District 16
2010 population: 431,916
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -38,117
Percentage difference: -8.1%

District name: Senate District 17
2010 population: 456,960
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -12,544
Percentage difference: -2.8%

District name: Senate District 18
2010 population: 404,822
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -65,211
Percentage difference: -13.9%

District name: Senate District 19
2010 population: 477,068
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +7,035
Percentage difference: 1.5%

District name: Senate District 2
2010 population: 449,902
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -20,131
Percentage difference: -4.3%

District name: Senate District 20
2010 population: 576,207
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +106,174
Percentage difference: 22.6%

District name: Senate District 21
2010 population: 529,870
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +59,837
Percentage difference: 12.7%

District name: Senate District 22
2010 population: 419,763
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -50,270
Percentage difference: -10.7%

District name: Senate District 23
2010 population: 458,330
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -11,703
Percentage difference: -2.5%

District name: Senate District 24
2010 population: 524,254
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +54,221
Percentage difference: 11.5%

District name: Senate District 25
2010 population: 428,398
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -41,635
Percentage difference: -8.9%

District name: Senate District 26
2010 population: 481,892
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +11,859
Percentage difference: 2.5%

District name: Senate District 27
2010 population: 551,555
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +90,737
Percentage difference: 17.3%

District name: Senate District 28
2010 population: 545,085
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +75,052
Percentage difference: 16%

District name: Senate District 29
2010 population: 397,144
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -72,889
Percentage difference: -15.5%

District name: Senate District 3
2010 population: 495,081
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +25,048
Percentage difference: 5.3%

District name: Senate District 30
2010 population: 458,703
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -11,330
Percentage difference: -2.4%

District name: Senate District 31
2010 population: 432,649
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -37,384
Percentage difference: -8%

District name: Senate District 32
2010 population: 428,898
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -41,135
Percentage difference: -8.8%

District name: Senate District 33
2010 population: 404,290
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -65,743
Percentage difference: -14%

District name: Senate District 34
2010 population: 481,165
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +11,132
Percentage difference: 2.4%

District name: Senate District 35
2010 population: 438,861
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -31,172
Percentage difference: -6.6%

District name: Senate District 36
2010 population: 418,626
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -51,407
Percentage difference: -10.9%

District name: Senate District 37
2010 population: 480,189
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +10,156
Percentage difference: 2.2%

District name: Senate District 38
2010 population: 442,810
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -27,223
Percentage difference: -5.8%

District name: Senate District 39
2010 population: 483,183
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +13,150
Percentage difference: 2.8%

District name: Senate District 4
2010 population: 433,628
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -36,405
Percentage difference: -7.7%

District name: Senate District 40
2010 population: 448,543
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -21,490
Percentage difference: -4.6%

District name: Senate District 5
2010 population: 515,369
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +45,336
Percentage difference: 9.6%

District name: Senate District 6
2010 population: 451,464
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -18,569
Percentage difference: -4%

District name: Senate District 7
2010 population: 432,554
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -37,479
Percentage difference: -8%

District name: Senate District 8
2010 population: 525,674
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +55,641
Percentage difference: 11.8%

District name: Senate District 9
2010 population: 527,435
Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +57,402
Percentage difference: 12.2%