District name: Senate District 1 2010 population: 424,456 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -45,577 Percentage difference: -9.7% |
District name: Senate District 10 2010 population: 565,921 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +95,888 Percentage difference: 20.4% |
District name: Senate District 11 2010 population: 433,661 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -36,372 Percentage difference: -7.7% |
District name: Senate District 12 2010 population: 531,959 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +75,052 Percentage difference: 13.2% |
District name: Senate District 13 2010 population: 394,766 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -75,267 Percentage difference: -16% |
District name: Senate District 14 2010 population: 457,489 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -12,544 Percentage difference: -2.7% |
District name: Senate District 15 2010 population: 560,770 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +90,737 Percentage difference: 19.3% |
District name: Senate District 16 2010 population: 431,916 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -38,117 Percentage difference: -8.1% |
District name: Senate District 17 2010 population: 456,960 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -12,544 Percentage difference: -2.8% |
District name: Senate District 18 2010 population: 404,822 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -65,211 Percentage difference: -13.9% |
District name: Senate District 19 2010 population: 477,068 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +7,035 Percentage difference: 1.5% |
District name: Senate District 2 2010 population: 449,902 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -20,131 Percentage difference: -4.3% |
District name: Senate District 20 2010 population: 576,207 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +106,174 Percentage difference: 22.6% |
District name: Senate District 21 2010 population: 529,870 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +59,837 Percentage difference: 12.7% |
District name: Senate District 22 2010 population: 419,763 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -50,270 Percentage difference: -10.7% |
District name: Senate District 23 2010 population: 458,330 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -11,703 Percentage difference: -2.5% |
District name: Senate District 24 2010 population: 524,254 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +54,221 Percentage difference: 11.5% |
District name: Senate District 25 2010 population: 428,398 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -41,635 Percentage difference: -8.9% |
District name: Senate District 26 2010 population: 481,892 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +11,859 Percentage difference: 2.5% |
District name: Senate District 27 2010 population: 551,555 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +90,737 Percentage difference: 17.3% |
District name: Senate District 28 2010 population: 545,085 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +75,052 Percentage difference: 16% |
District name: Senate District 29 2010 population: 397,144 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -72,889 Percentage difference: -15.5% |
District name: Senate District 3 2010 population: 495,081 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +25,048 Percentage difference: 5.3% |
District name: Senate District 30 2010 population: 458,703 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -11,330 Percentage difference: -2.4% |
District name: Senate District 31 2010 population: 432,649 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -37,384 Percentage difference: -8% |
District name: Senate District 32 2010 population: 428,898 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -41,135 Percentage difference: -8.8% |
District name: Senate District 33 2010 population: 404,290 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -65,743 Percentage difference: -14% |
District name: Senate District 34 2010 population: 481,165 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +11,132 Percentage difference: 2.4% |
District name: Senate District 35 2010 population: 438,861 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -31,172 Percentage difference: -6.6% |
District name: Senate District 36 2010 population: 418,626 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -51,407 Percentage difference: -10.9% |
District name: Senate District 37 2010 population: 480,189 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +10,156 Percentage difference: 2.2% |
District name: Senate District 38 2010 population: 442,810 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -27,223 Percentage difference: -5.8% |
District name: Senate District 39 2010 population: 483,183 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +13,150 Percentage difference: 2.8% |
District name: Senate District 4 2010 population: 433,628 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -36,405 Percentage difference: -7.7% |
District name: Senate District 40 2010 population: 448,543 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -21,490 Percentage difference: -4.6% |
District name: Senate District 5 2010 population: 515,369 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +45,336 Percentage difference: 9.6% |
District name: Senate District 6 2010 population: 451,464 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -18,569 Percentage difference: -4% |
District name: Senate District 7 2010 population: 432,554 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: -37,479 Percentage difference: -8% |
District name: Senate District 8 2010 population: 525,674 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +55,641 Percentage difference: 11.8% |
District name: Senate District 9 2010 population: 527,435 Difference from ideal population of 470,033: +57,402 Percentage difference: 12.2% |