Dist Name: House District 1
2010 Population: 159,402
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +3,612
Percentage difference: 1.7%

Dist Name: House District 10
2010 Population: 151,214
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -5,464
Percentage difference: -3.5%

Dist Name: House District 100
2010 Population: 137,630
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -19,048
Percentage difference: -12.2%

Dist Name: House District 101
2010 Population: 189,600
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +32,922
Percentage difference: 21%

Dist Name: House District 102
2010 Population: 160,952
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +4,512
Percentage difference: 2.7%

Dist Name: House District 103
2010 Population: 138,339
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -18,339
Percentage difference: -11.7%

Dist Name: House District 104
2010 Population: 137,432
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -19,246
Percentage difference: -12.3%

Dist Name: House District 105
2010 Population: 151,273
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -5,405
Percentage difference: -3.4%

Dist Name: House District 106
2010 Population: 150,952
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -5,726
Percentage difference: -3.7%

Dist Name: House District 107
2010 Population: 156,177
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -501
Percentage difference: -0.3%

Dist Name: House District 108
2010 Population: 132,251
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -24,427
Percentage difference: -15.6%

Dist Name: House District 109
2010 Population: 135,230
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -21,448
Percentage difference: -13.7%

Dist Name: House District 11
2010 Population: 163,223
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +6,545
Percentage difference: 4.2%

Dist Name: House District 110
2010 Population: 132,138
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -24,540
Percentage difference: -15.7%

Dist Name: House District 111
2010 Population: 139,430
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -17,248
Percentage difference: -11%

Dist Name: House District 112
2010 Population: 210,556
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +53,878
Percentage difference: 34.4%

Dist Name: House District 113
2010 Population: 136,597
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -20,081
Percentage difference: -12.8%

Dist Name: House District 114
2010 Population: 133,125
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -23,553
Percentage difference: -15%

Dist Name: House District 115
2010 Population: 135,054
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -21,624
Percentage difference: -13.8%

Dist Name: House District 116
2010 Population: 134,681
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -21,997
Percentage difference: -14%

Dist Name: House District 117
2010 Population: 150,960
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -5,718
Percentage difference: -3.6%

Dist Name: House District 118
2010 Population: 162,848
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +6,545
Percentage difference: 3.9%

Dist Name: House District 119
2010 Population: 154,679
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -1,999
Percentage difference: -1.3%

Dist Name: House District 12
2010 Population: 159,354
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +2,676
Percentage difference: 1.7%

Dist Name: House District 120
2010 Population: 170,078
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +13,400
Percentage difference: 8.6%

Dist Name: House District 13
2010 Population: 195,431
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +38,753
Percentage difference: 24.7%

Dist Name: House District 14
2010 Population: 134,417
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -22,261
Percentage difference: -14.2%

Dist Name: House District 15
2010 Population: 159,402
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -32,167
Percentage difference: -20.5%

Dist Name: House District 16
2010 Population: 140,428
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -16,250
Percentage difference: -10.4%

Dist Name: House District 17
2010 Population: 161,943
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +5,348
Percentage difference: 3.4%

Dist Name: House District 18
2010 Population: 161,190
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +4,512
Percentage difference: 2.9%

Dist Name: House District 19
2010 Population: 175,628
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +20,061
Percentage difference: 12.1%

Dist Name: House District 2
2010 Population: 139,453
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -17,225
Percentage difference: -11%

Dist Name: House District 20
2010 Population: 201,953
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +45,275
Percentage difference: 28.9%

Dist Name: House District 21
2010 Population: 145,063
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -11,615
Percentage difference: -7.4%

Dist Name: House District 22
2010 Population: 176,739
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +20,061
Percentage difference: 12.8%

Dist Name: House District 23
2010 Population: 142,648
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -14,030
Percentage difference: -9%

Dist Name: House District 24
2010 Population: 166,317
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +9,639
Percentage difference: 6.2%

Dist Name: House District 25
2010 Population: 179,031
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +22,353
Percentage difference: 14.3%

Dist Name: House District 26
2010 Population: 165,010
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +8,814
Percentage difference: 5.3%

Dist Name: House District 27
2010 Population: 131,755
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -24,923
Percentage difference: -15.9%

Dist Name: House District 28
2010 Population: 154,175
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -2,503
Percentage difference: -1.6%

Dist Name: House District 29
2010 Population: 160,290
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +3,612
Percentage difference: 2.3%

Dist Name: House District 3
2010 Population: 159,402
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -30,425
Percentage difference: -19.4%

Dist Name: House District 30
2010 Population: 180,594
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +25,782
Percentage difference: 15.3%

Dist Name: House District 31
2010 Population: 138,215
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -18,463
Percentage difference: -11.8%

Dist Name: House District 32
2010 Population: 177,523
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +22,353
Percentage difference: 13.3%

Dist Name: House District 33
2010 Population: 196,662
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +39,984
Percentage difference: 25.5%

Dist Name: House District 34
2010 Population: 144,119
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -12,559
Percentage difference: -8%

Dist Name: House District 35
2010 Population: 154,735
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -1,943
Percentage difference: -1.2%

Dist Name: House District 36
2010 Population: 157,126
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +448
Percentage difference: 0.3%

Dist Name: House District 37
2010 Population: 135,554
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -21,124
Percentage difference: -13.5%

Dist Name: House District 38
2010 Population: 162,248
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +5,570
Percentage difference: 3.6%

Dist Name: House District 39
2010 Population: 132,191
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -24,487
Percentage difference: -15.6%

Dist Name: House District 4
2010 Population: 144,198
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -12,480
Percentage difference: -8%

Dist Name: House District 40
2010 Population: 149,664
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -7,014
Percentage difference: -4.5%

Dist Name: House District 41
2010 Population: 252,332
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +95,654
Percentage difference: 61.1%

Dist Name: House District 42
2010 Population: 214,866
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +58,188
Percentage difference: 37.1%

Dist Name: House District 43
2010 Population: 162,052
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +5,487
Percentage difference: 3.4%

Dist Name: House District 44
2010 Population: 171,652
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +14,974
Percentage difference: 9.6%

Dist Name: House District 45
2010 Population: 146,618
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -10,060
Percentage difference: -6.4%

Dist Name: House District 46
2010 Population: 142,772
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -13,906
Percentage difference: -8.9%

Dist Name: House District 47
2010 Population: 157,056
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +378
Percentage difference: 0.2%

Dist Name: House District 48
2010 Population: 136,924
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -19,754
Percentage difference: -12.6%

Dist Name: House District 49
2010 Population: 172,598
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +18,196
Percentage difference: 10.2%

Dist Name: House District 5
2010 Population: 154,014
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -2,664
Percentage difference: -1.7%

Dist Name: House District 50
2010 Population: 131,026
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -25,652
Percentage difference: -16.4%

Dist Name: House District 51
2010 Population: 180,594
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -27,534
Percentage difference: -17.6%

Dist Name: House District 52
2010 Population: 139,789
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -16,889
Percentage difference: -10.8%

Dist Name: House District 53
2010 Population: 133,115
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -23,563
Percentage difference: -15%

Dist Name: House District 54
2010 Population: 130,417
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -26,261
Percentage difference: -16.8%

Dist Name: House District 55
2010 Population: 133,112
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -23,566
Percentage difference: -15%

Dist Name: House District 56
2010 Population: 192,632
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +38,753
Percentage difference: 22.9%

Dist Name: House District 57
2010 Population: 148,460
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -8,218
Percentage difference: -5.2%

Dist Name: House District 58
2010 Population: 131,897
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -24,781
Percentage difference: -15.8%

Dist Name: House District 59
2010 Population: 141,651
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -15,027
Percentage difference: -9.6%

Dist Name: House District 6
2010 Population: 147,936
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -8,742
Percentage difference: -5.6%

Dist Name: House District 60
2010 Population: 162,605
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +5,927
Percentage difference: 3.8%

Dist Name: House District 61
2010 Population: 242,396
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +85,718
Percentage difference: 54.7%

Dist Name: House District 62
2010 Population: 162,165
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +5,487
Percentage difference: 3.5%

Dist Name: House District 63
2010 Population: 156,183
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -495
Percentage difference: -0.3%

Dist Name: House District 64
2010 Population: 165,492
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +8,814
Percentage difference: 5.6%

Dist Name: House District 65
2010 Population: 180,594
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +22,824
Percentage difference: 14.6%

Dist Name: House District 66
2010 Population: 162,026
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +5,374
Percentage difference: 3.4%

Dist Name: House District 67
2010 Population: 241,034
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +84,356
Percentage difference: 53.8%

Dist Name: House District 68
2010 Population: 128,684
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -27,994
Percentage difference: -17.9%

Dist Name: House District 69
2010 Population: 132,224
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -24,454
Percentage difference: -15.6%

Dist Name: House District 7
2010 Population: 169,309
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +12,631
Percentage difference: 8.1%

Dist Name: House District 70
2010 Population: 150,125
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -6,553
Percentage difference: -4.2%

Dist Name: House District 71
2010 Population: 183,147
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +32,728
Percentage difference: 16.9%

Dist Name: House District 72
2010 Population: 167,184
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +10,506
Percentage difference: 6.7%

Dist Name: House District 73
2010 Population: 189,406
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +32,728
Percentage difference: 20.9%

Dist Name: House District 74
2010 Population: 182,460
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +25,782
Percentage difference: 16.5%

Dist Name: House District 75
2010 Population: 174,874
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +18,196
Percentage difference: 11.6%

Dist Name: House District 76
2010 Population: 149,992
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -6,686
Percentage difference: -4.3%

Dist Name: House District 77
2010 Population: 147,455
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -9,223
Percentage difference: -5.9%

Dist Name: House District 78
2010 Population: 156,153
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -525
Percentage difference: -0.3%

Dist Name: House District 79
2010 Population: 187,203
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +32,728
Percentage difference: 19.5%

Dist Name: House District 8
2010 Population: 152,934
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -3,744
Percentage difference: -2.4%

Dist Name: House District 80
2010 Population: 148,503
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -8,175
Percentage difference: -5.2%

Dist Name: House District 81
2010 Population: 201,633
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +45,275
Percentage difference: 28.7%

Dist Name: House District 82
2010 Population: 172,265
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +15,587
Percentage difference: 9.9%

Dist Name: House District 83
2010 Population: 168,377
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +11,699
Percentage difference: 7.5%

Dist Name: House District 84
2010 Population: 144,934
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -11,744
Percentage difference: -7.5%

Dist Name: House District 85
2010 Population: 193,827
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +38,753
Percentage difference: 23.7%

Dist Name: House District 86
2010 Population: 142,110
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -14,568
Percentage difference: -9.3%

Dist Name: House District 87
2010 Population: 137,131
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -19,547
Percentage difference: -12.5%

Dist Name: House District 88
2010 Population: 164,967
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +8,289
Percentage difference: 5.3%

Dist Name: House District 89
2010 Population: 140,077
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -16,601
Percentage difference: -10.6%

Dist Name: House District 9
2010 Population: 147,197
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -9,481
Percentage difference: -6.1%

Dist Name: House District 90
2010 Population: 142,553
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -14,125
Percentage difference: -9%

Dist Name: House District 91
2010 Population: 129,999
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -26,679
Percentage difference: -17%

Dist Name: House District 92
2010 Population: 133,187
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -23,491
Percentage difference: -15%

Dist Name: House District 93
2010 Population: 131,283
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -25,395
Percentage difference: -16.2%

Dist Name: House District 94
2010 Population: 135,245
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -21,433
Percentage difference: -13.7%

Dist Name: House District 95
2010 Population: 134,355
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -22,323
Percentage difference: -14.2%

Dist Name: House District 96
2010 Population: 140,377
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -16,301
Percentage difference: -10.4%

Dist Name: House District 97
2010 Population: 169,848
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: +13,400
Percentage difference: 8.4%

Dist Name: House District 98
2010 Population: 134,942
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -21,736
Percentage difference: -13.9%

Dist Name: House District 99
2010 Population: 137,645
Difference from ideal population of 156,678: -19,033
Percentage difference: -12.1%