90 lines
2.6 KiB
HTML
90 lines
2.6 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
|
|
<title>Population change in Greater Manchester - Google Fusion Tables</title>
|
|
<style type="text/css">
|
|
html, body {
|
|
margin: 0;
|
|
padding: 0;
|
|
height: 100%;
|
|
}
|
|
</style></head>
|
|
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Trafford</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 217,300<br>
|
|
<b>2.5% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
19.8% children<br>
|
|
61.21% working age<br>
|
|
19.01% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Oldham</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 219,800<br>
|
|
<b>0.9% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
22.2% children<br>
|
|
59.83% working age<br>
|
|
17.97% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Stockport</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 219,800<br>
|
|
<b>0.9% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
22.2% children<br>
|
|
59.83% working age<br>
|
|
17.97% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Tameside</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 216,900<br>
|
|
<b>1.8% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
19.5% children<br>
|
|
61.69% working age<br>
|
|
18.76% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Manchester</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 498,800<br>
|
|
<b>11.6% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
17.5% children<br>
|
|
70.69% working age<br>
|
|
11.81% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Rochdale</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 205,200<br>
|
|
<b>0.2% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
21.2% children<br>
|
|
60.92% working age<br>
|
|
17.88% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Salford</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 229,000<br>
|
|
<b>4.4% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
18.2% children<br>
|
|
64.72% working age<br>
|
|
17.12% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Bolton</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 266,500<br>
|
|
<b>1.4% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
20.8% children<br>
|
|
60.26% working age<br>
|
|
18.91% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Wigan</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 307,600<br>
|
|
<b>1.4% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
18.8% children<br>
|
|
61.25% working age<br>
|
|
19.93% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<b>Bury</b> <br>
|
|
Population: 183,800<br>
|
|
<b>1.5% change from 2005 to 2010</b><br>
|
|
20.1% children<br>
|
|
60.77% working age<br>
|
|
19.04% retired<br>
|
|
|
|
</div></td></tr></table></body></html> |