418 lines
22 KiB
HTML
418 lines
22 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
|
||
<title>Merge of MedicaidStateData and DEMO: US States - Google Fusion Tables</title>
|
||
<style type="text/css">
|
||
html, body {
|
||
margin: 0;
|
||
padding: 0;
|
||
height: 100%;
|
||
}
|
||
</style></head>
|
||
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Alabama<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 13.9<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 107,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> AL
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Alaska<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 18.6<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 28,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> AK
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Arizona<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 17.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 469,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> Republican lawmakers in Arizona are challenging the state’s law expanding Medicaid eligibility in court. They argue the law should not have been passed last summer without a supermajority – a state requirement for approval of any tax increases. A state superior court struck down the challenge, but the legislators are working with the Goldwater Institute, an Arizona conservative advocacy group, to appeal the ruling.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> AZ
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Arkansas<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 17.9<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 281,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> In April, Arkansas became one of the only states in the South to expand Medicaid eligibility requirements. The Arkansas legislature nearly did not extend the Medicaid eligibility into 2015, but finally passed a plan on March 4 to continue the expansion into the next year after weeks of gridlock. Arkansas and Iowa are the only states with a “private option” expansion model that uses federal Medicaid money to buy private insurance for low-income residents, although several other states are considering similar programs.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> AR
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> California<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 18.8<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 2,979,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> CA
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Colorado<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 14.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 332,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> CO
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Connecticut<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 8.3<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 107,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> CT
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Delaware<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 10.4<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 38,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> DE
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> District of Columbia<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 8.2<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 27,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> DC
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Florida<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 20.6<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 457,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> FL
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Georgia<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 19.2<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 314,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> GA
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Hawaii<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 7.8<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 58,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> HI
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Idaho<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 16.4<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 37,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> ID
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Illinois<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 14.2<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 801,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> IL
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Indiana<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 12.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 140,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> Indiana politicians, notably Republican Gov. Mike Pence, have resisted expansion of the federal Medicaid program but are looking to expand the state’s own insurance program for low-income Indiana residents, the Healthy Indiana Program, using Medicaid funds. The program does not provide as comprehensive coverage as Medicaid, in part because it lacks coverage for maternity care. On Feb. 21, Pence formally requested that the Department of Health and Human Services consider the proposal.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> IN
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Iowa<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 10.1<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 143,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> Iowa is one of two states that expanded Medicaid eligibility requirements through a so-called private option, an expansion model that uses federal Medicaid money to buy private insurance for low-income residents. Arkansas, he other state with a private option, recently voted not to continue its Medicaid expansion program into 2015.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> IA
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Kansas<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 13.1<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 58,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> KS
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Kentucky<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 15.0<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 350,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> KY
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Louisiana<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 19.6<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 132,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> LA
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Maine<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 9.8<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 11,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> ME
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Maryland<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 13.1<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 299,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> MD
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Massachusetts<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 3.8<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 89,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> MA
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Michigan<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 11.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 500,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> MI
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Minnesota<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 8.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 259,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> MN
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Mississippi<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 15.8<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 74,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> MS
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Missouri<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 14.1<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> debating partial Medicaid expansion<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 7<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 179,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> Missouri’s Republican-controlled state legislature blocked expansion of Medicaid eligibility requirements in early February against the wishes of Democratic Governor Jay Nixon. Later that month, a Republican legislator introduced a modified proposal that would expand Medicaid eligibility but only to low-income residents with jobs. The legislature has yet to vote on the new bill.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> MO
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Montana<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 18.2<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 28,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> MT
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Nebraska<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 12.8<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> debating Medicaid expansion<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 37,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> Lawmakers in Nebraska sent a Medicaid expansion bill out of committee Feb. 24 to be debated by the full unicameral legislature. It would use federal Medicaid money to help low-income Nebraskans afford premiums and copays from plans on the Affordable Care Act health insurance marketplaces.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> NE
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Nevada<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 23.0<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 304,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> NV
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> New Hampshire<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 12.3<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> debating Medicaid expansion<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 18,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> New Hampshire legislators announced Feb. 6 they had forged a bipartisan deal to expand Medicaid in the state. Lawmakers are scheduled to vote on the bill in March.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> NH
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> New Jersey<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 14.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 466,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> NJ
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> New Mexico<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 20.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 204,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> NM
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> New York<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 11.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 950,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> NY
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> North Carolina<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 16.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 168,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> NC
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> North Dakota<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 10.3<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 27,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> ND
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Ohio<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 13.0<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 734,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> OH
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Oklahoma<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 17.1<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 71,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> OK
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Oregon<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 14.6<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 260,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> OR
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Pennsylvania<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 11.4<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> debating Medicaid expansion<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 224,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> In September, Republican Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett announced a plan that would expand Medicaid in the state by allowing residents who qualify to select a subsidized plan through the online insurance marketplaces. A similar plan has already been implemented in Arkansas. The legislature has yet to act on Corbett’s proposal, although he mentioned it in his State of the State address in February.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> PA
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Rhode Island<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 12.2<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 54,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> RI
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> South Carolina<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 16.6<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 134,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> SC
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> South Dakota<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 13.7<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> debating partial Medicaid expansion<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 7<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 16,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> South Dakota legislators announced last week they were looking into a partial Medicaid expansion that would extend Medicaid coverage to those who fall below the poverty line. A full Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act would include all residents who fall below 138 percent of the poverty line.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> SD
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Tennessee<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 13.6<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> debating Medicaid expansion<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 147,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> Although Tennessee did not expand Medicaid eligibility requirements before the start of 2014, Republican Gov. Bill Haslam implied during his State of the State address earlier this month that he had not made a final decision about the program. “I’m hesitant to commit additional dollars to Medicaid when it’s already eating up so much of our budget,” he said. “But I also understand that the decision isn't just as easy as standing here today and saying, 'We're not going to expand Medicaid.’ There are hospitals across this state, many of them in rural communities, that are going to struggle if not close under the health care law without expansion, and that's not something to take lightly.”<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> TN
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Texas<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 24.2<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 874,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> TX
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Utah<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 14.5<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> debating Medicaid expansion<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 61,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> Republican lawmakers in Utah announced a plan mid-February to create a Medicaid alternative that would provide some benefits to low-income residents. The program would cost Utah between $30 million and $35 million, far less than the $800 million Medicaid expansion in the state would cost the federal government. The full Utah legislature has yet to vote on the proposal.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> UT
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Vermont<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 7.8<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 17,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> VT
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Virginia<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 12.9<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> debating Medicaid expansion<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 98,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> Virginia state senators February revealed a plan that would expand Medicaid in the state using a so-called private option, like those in place in Arkansas and Iowa. The plan would use federal Medicaid money to buy private insurance for low-income residents. The legislature has yet to vote on the proposal.<br><br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> VA
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Washington<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 14.0<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 449,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> WA
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> West Virginia<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 14.8<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 143,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> WV
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Wisconsin<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 10.0<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 201,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> WI
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Wyoming<br>
|
||
<b>Rate:</b> 16.6<br>
|
||
<b>Status:</b> not expanding Medicaid<br>
|
||
<b>StatusCode:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Number:</b> 10,000<br>
|
||
<b>Information:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>State Acronym:</b> WY
|
||
</div></td></tr></table></body></html> |