290 lines
24 KiB
HTML
290 lines
24 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
|
|
<title>MAP: SuburbanPovertyFT - Google Fusion Tables</title>
|
|
<style type="text/css">
|
|
html, body {
|
|
margin: 0;
|
|
padding: 0;
|
|
height: 100%;
|
|
}
|
|
</style></head>
|
|
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Andover</h1>
|
|
<h2>5.2% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Andover's population saw a 15% change between 2000 and 2010, from 26,588 to 30,598.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 5.2% (or 1,577 people). It was 2.0% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Andover is $30,850.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Andover residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be N/A%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Apple Valley</h1>
|
|
<h2>5.7% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Apple Valley's population saw a 8% change between 2000 and 2010, from 45,527 to 49,084.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 5.7% (or 2,836 people). It was 2.1% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Apple Valley is $36,097.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Apple Valley residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 31.0%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Blaine</h1>
|
|
<h2>5.5% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Blaine's population saw a 27% change between 2000 and 2010, from 44,942 to 57,186.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 5.5% (or 3,026 people). It was 3.0% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Blaine is $30,729.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Blaine residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 31.9%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Bloomington</h1>
|
|
<h2>10.6% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Bloomington's population saw a -3% change between 2000 and 2010, from 85,172 to 82,893.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 10.6% (or 5,498 people). It was 4.0% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Bloomington is $34,136.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Bloomington residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 33.8%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Brooklyn Center</h1>
|
|
<h2>14.1% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Brooklyn Center's population saw a 3% change between 2000 and 2010, from 29,172 to 30,104.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 14.1% (or 3,791 people). It was 7.4% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Brooklyn Center is $22,110.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Brooklyn Center residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 41.5%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Brooklyn Park</h1>
|
|
<h2>9.1% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Brooklyn Park's population saw a 12% change between 2000 and 2010, from 67,388 to 75,781.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 9.1% (or 7,236 people). It was 5.1% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Brooklyn Park is $25,501.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Brooklyn Park residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 41.0%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Burnsville</h1>
|
|
<h2>8.1% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Burnsville's population saw a 0% change between 2000 and 2010, from 60,220 to 60,306.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 8.1% (or 4,747 people). It was 5.1% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Burnsville is $32,289.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Burnsville residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 33.8%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Champlin</h1>
|
|
<h2>2.6% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Champlin's population saw a 4% change between 2000 and 2010, from 22,193 to 23,089.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 2.6% (or 624 people). It was 2.5% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Champlin is $32,431.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Champlin residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be N/A%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Chanhassen</h1>
|
|
<h2>3.8% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Chanhassen's population saw a 13% change between 2000 and 2010, from 20,321 to 22,952.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 3.8% (or 901 people). It was 1.9% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Chanhassen is $44,567.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Chanhassen residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 31.6%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Chaska</h1>
|
|
<h2>7.8% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Chaska's population saw a 36% change between 2000 and 2010, from 17,449 to 23,770.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 7.8% (or 1,894 people). It was 4.7% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Chaska is $33,466.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Chaska residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 34.6%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Coon Rapids</h1>
|
|
<h2>7.2% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Coon Rapids's population saw a -0% change between 2000 and 2010, from 61,607 to 61,476.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 7.2% (or 4,451 people). It was 4.8% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Coon Rapids is $26,959.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Coon Rapids residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 37.5%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Cottage Grove</h1>
|
|
<h2>3.3% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Cottage Grove's population saw a 13% change between 2000 and 2010, from 30,582 to 34,589.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 3.3% (or 1,116 people). It was 2.2% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Cottage Grove is $29,791.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Cottage Grove residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 32.6%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Crystal</h1>
|
|
<h2>9.6% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Crystal's population saw a -2% change between 2000 and 2010, from 22,698 to 22,151.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 9.6% (or 2,062 people). It was 4.4% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Crystal is $27,717.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Crystal residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 33.2%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Eagan</h1>
|
|
<h2>4.5% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Eagan's population saw a 1% change between 2000 and 2010, from 63,557 to 64,206.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 4.5% (or 2,884 people). It was 2.9% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Eagan is $38,449.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Eagan residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 28.8%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Eden Prairie</h1>
|
|
<h2>5.1% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Eden Prairie's population saw a 11% change between 2000 and 2010, from 54,901 to 60,797.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 5.1% (or 3,151 people). It was 3.5% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Eden Prairie is $49,120.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Eden Prairie residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 27.4%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Edina</h1>
|
|
<h2>3.3% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Edina's population saw a 1% change between 2000 and 2010, from 47,425 to 47,941.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 3.3% (or 1,513 people). It was 3.3% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Edina is $55,013.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Edina residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 32.0%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Fridley</h1>
|
|
<h2>9.3% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Fridley's population saw a -1% change between 2000 and 2010, from 27,449 to 27,208.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 9.3% (or 2,378 people). It was 7.3% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Fridley is $26,423.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Fridley residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 31.9%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Golden Valley</h1>
|
|
<h2>4.9% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Golden Valley's population saw a 0% change between 2000 and 2010, from 20,281 to 20,371.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 4.9% (or 982 people). It was 3.0% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Golden Valley is $44,536.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Golden Valley residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 31.4%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Hastings</h1>
|
|
<h2>5.3% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Hastings's population saw a 22% change between 2000 and 2010, from 18,204 to 22,172.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 5.3% (or 1,169 people). It was 4.9% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Hastings is $27,822.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Hastings residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 34.3%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Inver Grove Heights</h1>
|
|
<h2>5.5% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Inver Grove Heights's population saw a 14% change between 2000 and 2010, from 29,751 to 33,880.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 5.5% (or 1,825 people). It was 4.2% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Inver Grove Heights is $33,339.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Inver Grove Heights residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 33.0%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Lakeville</h1>
|
|
<h2>2.8% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Lakeville's population saw a 30% change between 2000 and 2010, from 43,128 to 55,954.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 2.8% (or 1,537 people). It was 2.0% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Lakeville is $36,225.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Lakeville residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 28.0%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Lino Lakes</h1>
|
|
<h2>2.3% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Lino Lakes's population saw a 20% change between 2000 and 2010, from 16,791 to 20,216.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 2.3% (or 438 people). It was 3.0% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Lino Lakes is $31,887.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Lino Lakes residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be N/A%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Maple Grove</h1>
|
|
<h2>2.8% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Maple Grove's population saw a 22% change between 2000 and 2010, from 50,365 to 61,567.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 2.8% (or 1,739 people). It was 1.4% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Maple Grove is $40,334.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Maple Grove residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 23.1%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Maplewood</h1>
|
|
<h2>11.4% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Maplewood's population saw a 9% change between 2000 and 2010, from 34,947 to 38,018.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 11.4% (or 3,994 people). It was 4.8% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Maplewood is $28,183.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Maplewood residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 38.1%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Minnetonka</h1>
|
|
<h2>4.3% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Minnetonka's population saw a -3% change between 2000 and 2010, from 51,301 to 49,734.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 4.3% (or 2,157 people). It was 2.6% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Minnetonka is $47,836.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Minnetonka residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 30.4%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>New Brighton</h1>
|
|
<h2>N/A% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
New Brighton's population saw a -3% change between 2000 and 2010, from 22,206 to 21,456.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be N/A% (or 2,128 people). It was N/A% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in New Brighton is $30,856.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of New Brighton residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 30.8%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>New Hope</h1>
|
|
<h2>10.6% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
New Hope's population saw a -3% change between 2000 and 2010, from 20,873 to 20,339.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 10.6% (or 2,066 people). It was 6.5% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in New Hope is $24,579.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of New Hope residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 39.1%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Oakdale</h1>
|
|
<h2>7.4% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Oakdale's population saw a 3% change between 2000 and 2010, from 26,653 to 27,378.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 7.4% (or 2,017 people). It was 3.6% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Oakdale is $30,800.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Oakdale residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 33.6%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Plymouth</h1>
|
|
<h2>2.3% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Plymouth's population saw a 7% change between 2000 and 2010, from 65,894 to 70,576.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 2.3% (or 2,825 people). It was 2.6% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Plymouth is $46,644.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Plymouth residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 30.4%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Prior Lake</h1>
|
|
<h2>3.0% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Prior Lake's population saw a 43% change between 2000 and 2010, from 15,917 to 22,796.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 3.0% (or 729 people). It was 3.6% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Prior Lake is $39,250.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Prior Lake residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 32.1%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Ramsey</h1>
|
|
<h2>1.4% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Ramsey's population saw a 28% change between 2000 and 2010, from 18,510 to 23,668.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 1.4% (or 338 people). It was 1.6% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Ramsey is $30,141.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Ramsey residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be N/A%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Richfield</h1>
|
|
<h2>10.7% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Richfield's population saw a 2% change between 2000 and 2010, from 34,439 to 35,228.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 10.7% (or 3,527 people). It was 6.3% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Richfield is $26,795.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Richfield residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 41.5%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Rosemount</h1>
|
|
<h2>2.5% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Rosemount's population saw a 50% change between 2000 and 2010, from 14,619 to 21,874.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 2.5% (or 528 people). It was 3.3% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Rosemount is $34,143.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Rosemount residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be N/A%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Roseville</h1>
|
|
<h2>8.5% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Roseville's population saw a -0% change between 2000 and 2010, from 33,690 to 33,660.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 8.5% (or 2,608 people). It was 4.2% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Roseville is $31,142.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Roseville residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 32.6%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Savage</h1>
|
|
<h2>3.4% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Savage's population saw a 27% change between 2000 and 2010, from 21,115 to 26,911.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 3.4% (or 946 people). It was 2.3% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Savage is $34,218.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Savage residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 31.2%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Shakopee</h1>
|
|
<h2>4.7% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Shakopee's population saw a 80% change between 2000 and 2010, from 20,568 to 37,076.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 4.7% (or 1,576 people). It was 3.5% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Shakopee is $31,666.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Shakopee residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 32.6%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Shoreview</h1>
|
|
<h2>2.4% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Shoreview's population saw a -3% change between 2000 and 2010, from 25,924 to 25,043.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 2.4% (or 612 people). It was 2.1% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Shoreview is $38,873.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Shoreview residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 29.3%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>St. Louis Park</h1>
|
|
<h2>8.4% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
St. Louis Park's population saw a 3% change between 2000 and 2010, from 44,126 to 45,250.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 8.4% (or 3,713 people). It was 5.2% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in St. Louis Park is $37,307.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of St. Louis Park residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 34.0%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>White Bear Lake</h1>
|
|
<h2>7.8% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
White Bear Lake's population saw a -2% change between 2000 and 2010, from 24,325 to 23,797.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 7.8% (or 1,876 people). It was 4.4% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in White Bear Lake is $30,136.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of White Bear Lake residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 37.9%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px;width:300px;height:25em;overflow-y:auto">
|
|
<h1>Woodbury</h1>
|
|
<h2>3.4% living in poverty</h2>
|
|
Woodbury's population saw a 33% change between 2000 and 2010, from 46,463 to 61,961.<br><br>
|
|
Its poverty rate, according to the American Community Survey, is estimated to be 3.4% (or 1,902 people). It was 1.7% in 2000.<br><br>
|
|
The estimated per capita income in Woodbury is $42,350.00.<br><br>
|
|
The percentage of Woodbury residents that spend at least 30 percent of their income on housing is estimated to be 29.6%.<br><br>
|
|
</div></td></tr></table></body></html> |