360 lines
38 KiB
HTML
360 lines
38 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
|
||
<title>Autonomous-Vehicle-Legislation-July-2017 - Google Fusion Tables</title>
|
||
<style type="text/css">
|
||
html, body {
|
||
margin: 0;
|
||
padding: 0;
|
||
height: 100%;
|
||
}
|
||
</style></head>
|
||
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Alabama<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://alisondb.legislature.state.al.us/ALISON/SearchableInstruments/2016RS/PrintFiles/SJR81-enr.pdf" target="_blank">SJR 81</a> (2016) — Passed in 2016, SJR 81 set up a joint legislative committee to study self-driving vehicles to better understand the issues of public safety and their economic impact on both the state and local governments.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/automation/Will-Alabama-Be-the-Next-State-to-Regulate-Driverless-Cars.html" target="_blank">Will Alabama Be the Next State to Regulate Driverless Cars?</a>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Arizona<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Executive Order<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 2<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="https://azgovernor.gov/sites/default/files/201508251002.pdf" target="_blank">EO 2015-09 (2015)</a> — In August 2015, Gov. Doug Ducey directed several state agencies to undertake "any necessary steps to support the testing and operation of self-driving vehicles on public roads." The order also set up a Self-Driving Vehicle Oversight Committee within the governor’s office. Ducey also made a splash in December 2016, welcoming Uber and its self-driving vehicles to the state after the troubled rollout in San Francisco.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Ubers-Pulls-Self-Driving-Vehicles-Off-Streets-of-San-Francisco-Transfers-to-Phoenix.htmlhttp://www.govtech.com/fs/10-Places-to-Watch-for-Autonomous-Vehicle-Developments.html?page=2" target="_blank">Ubers Pulls Self-Driving Vehicles Off Stress of San Francisco, Transfers to Phoenix</a>,
|
||
<a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/10-Places-to-Watch-for-Autonomous-Vehicle-Developments.html?page=2" target="_blank">10 Places to Watch for Autonomous Vehicle Developments</a>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Arkansas<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2017/2017R/Acts/Act797.pdf" target="_blank">HB 1754</a> (2017) — Arkansas passed more specialized legislation targeting commercial vehicle truck “platooning.” The bill amends the state’s driving regulations by eliminating the requirement that motor vehicles shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable, so long as they are equipped with driver-assistive truck platooning systems technology.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Georgia<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/Legislation/20172018/170675.pdf" target="_blank">HB 472</a> (2017) — Georgia in May of 2017 allowed an exemption on vehicles following closely to make way for truck platooning research.
|
||
<p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/Legislation/20172018/170801.pdf" target="_blank">SB 219</a> (2017) — In an expanded piece of legislation, the Peach state defined automated driving systems and allows for non-licensed drivers to operate an AV. The legislation also requires operators of the autonomous vehicles to register their vehicle with the state and adhere to certain insurance requirements.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Georgia-Officially-Gives-Autonomous-Cars-Green-Light.html" target="_blank">Georgia Officially Gives Autonomous Cars the Green Light</a>
|
||
</p></div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Hawaii<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Idaho<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Illinois<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Indiana<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Iowa<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Kansas<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Kentucky<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Louisiana<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://www.legis.la.gov/legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=1009651" target="_blank">HB 1143</a> (2016) — Louisiana’s bill defines autonomous technology, dynamic driving task and driving mode for purposes of highway regulatory provisions, and to provide for related matters.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Maine<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Maryland<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Massachusetts<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Executive Order<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 2<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> In October 2016, Gov. Charlie Baker issued <a href="http://www.mass.gov/governor/press-office/press-releases/fy2017/exec-order-signed-on-automated-driving-technologies.html" target="_blank">Executive Order 572</a> to promote the testing and deployment of highly automated driving technologies. The EO establishes The AV Working Group to consult and convene with experts on motor vehicle safety and vehicle automation. That group is also charged with crafting a memorandum of understanding that can be used between private companies and the Department of Transportation to negotiate testing and operation of AVs.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/10-Places-to-Watch-for-Autonomous-Vehicle-Developments.html?page=2" target="_blank">10 Places to Watch for Autonomous Vehicle Developments</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Massachusetts-Seeks-to-Become-Autonomous-Vehicle-Research-Testing-Hub.html" target="_blank">Massachusetts Seeks to Become Autonomous Vehicle Research Testing Hub</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Massachusetts-Boston-Officials-Sign-Executive-Orders-for-Autonomous-Car-Regulations.html" target="_blank">Massachusetts, Boston Officials Sign Executive Orders for Autonomous Car Regulations</a>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Michigan<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2013-2014/publicact/pdf/2013-PA-0231.pdf" target="_blank">SB 169</a> (2013) — As one of the major players in the autonomous vehicle manufacturing game, the state codified the definitions of automated technology, automated vehicle and automated mode. SB 169 also expressly permits testing of automated vehicles by certain parties under specific conditions.
|
||
<p>
|
||
<a href="https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2013-2014/publicact/pdf/2013-PA-0251.pdf" target="_blank">SB 663</a> (2013) — In the same 2013 session, Michigan passed legislation that limits the liability for AV manufacturers for damages in a product liability suit resulting from modifications made by third parties.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="https://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(21scscqo5er3flgloxiarkrd))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=2016-SB-0995" target="_blank">SB 995</a> (2016) — This legislation not only scraps the need for a person to physically be in the self-driving vehicle, but also allows for automated vehicle platoons in which connected vehicles travel together at electronically coordinated speeds, drafting behind one another to reduce wind resistance and increase fuel efficiency. SB 995 also authorizes on-demand autonomous vehicle networks.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="https://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(21scscqo5er3flgloxiarkrd))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=2016-SB-0996" target="_blank">SB 996</a> (2016) — Outlines specific parameters for entities that wish to offer on-demand autonomous vehicle networks to the public.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(bamnnazdms0yflwpjjzlbu24))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=2016-SB-0997" target="_blank">SB 997</a> (2016) — Recognizes the American Center for Mobility at Willow Run in statute and removes barriers to operating at the facility.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(bamnnazdms0yflwpjjzlbu24))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=2016-SB-0998" target="_blank">SB 998</a> (2016) — Exempts mechanics from any damages to vehicles that result from repairs, if the repairs were made in accordance with manufacturer specifications.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Whos-in-the-Drivers-Seat-for-Regulating-Autonomous-Vehicles.html" target="_blank">Who's in the Driver's Seat for Regulating Autonomous Vehicles?</a>,
|
||
<a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Michigan-Governor-Signs-AV-Rules-Eliminating-Human-Driver-Requirement.html" target="_blank">Michigan Governor Signs AV Rules Eliminating Human Driver Requirement</a>
|
||
</p></div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Minnesota<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Mississippi<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Missouri<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Montana<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Nebraska<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Nevada<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/76th2011/Bills/AB/AB511_EN.pdf" target="_blank">AB 511</a> (2011) — The first state to issue legislation on autonomous vehicles, Nevada was forward-looking when it defined AVs and allowed for their operation after obtaining a special license issued by the state DMV. The legislation also directed the DMV to adopt rules for license endorsement and for operation, including insurance, safety standards and testing.
|
||
<p>
|
||
<a href="https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/76th2011/Bills/SB/SB140_EN.pdf" target="_blank">SB 140</a> (2011) — Passed along with AB 511, this legislation allows for cellphone and other electronic device use while operating an AV.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/77th2013/Bills/SB/SB313_EN.pdf" target="_blank">SB 313</a> (2013) — Reining in a bit of the freedom for AV testers, SB 313 required that any autonomous vehicle being tested on a highway meet certain conditions relating to a human operator. The legislation also prohibited autonomous vehicles from being registered in the state, unless they meet certain conditions.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/79th2017/Bills/AB/AB69_EN.pdf" target="_blank">AB 69</a> (2017) — Nevada overhauled its AV legislation in 2017, defining several terms, creating room for vehicle platooning and regulating any crashes involving AVs to be reported to the state within 10 days. The legislation also eliminated the need for a human driver to be present during testing and operation. AB 69 also laid some of the groundwork for potential autonomous ride-sharing fleets, creating a permitting requirement and addressing accessibility issues.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/transportation/Nevada-DMV-Approves-Testing-Driverless-Vehicles.html" target="_blank">Nevada DMV Approves Testing Driverless Vehicles</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/automation/Nevada-Governor-Signs-Autonomous-Vehicle-Research-Legislation.html" target="_blank">Nevada Governor Signs Autnomous Vehicle Research Legislation</a>
|
||
</p></div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> New Hampshire<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> New Jersey<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> New Mexico<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> New York<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://nyassembly.gov/2017budget/budget_bills/A3005C.pdf" target="_blank">SB 2005</a> (2017) — New York recently passed legislation that gives authority to the commissioner of motor vehicles to approve AV testing within the state. The bill also codifies reporting and insurance requirements.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/transportation/Lawmakers-opt-for-study-not-regulation-of-unmanned-vehicles.html" target="_blank">Lawmakers Opt for Study, Not Regulation, of Unmanned Vehicles</a>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> North Carolina<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> North Dakota<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/64-2015/documents/15-0167-03000.pdf" target="_blank">HB 1065</a> (2015) — North Dakota solidified its intent on introducing and testing automated motor vehicles in the state. The bill also called for a study on how proliferation of AVs could affect road safety, congestion and fuel economy.
|
||
<p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/65-2017/documents/17-0711-04000.pdf" target="_blank">HB 1202</a> (2017) — Two years later, the state required the state DOT to investigate how automated driving technology could be installed in vehicles used to gather data and information on state highways. The DOT review will also include looking at current laws dealing with licensing, registration, insurance, data ownership and use, and inspection, and how they should apply to vehicles equipped with automated driving systems.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/transportation/Lawmakers-opt-for-study-not-regulation-of-unmanned-vehicles.html" target="_blank">Lawmakers Opt for Study, Not Regulation, of Unmanned Vehicles</a>
|
||
</p></div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Ohio<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Oklahoma<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Oregon<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Pennsylvania<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/li/uconsCheck.cfm?yr=2016&sessInd=0&act=101" target="_blank">SB 1267</a> (2016) — With much of the AV testing in the state being done by Carnegie Mellon and through the Pittsburgh/Uber partnership, the state did allocate $40 million for intelligent transportation system applications. This includes autonomous and connected vehicles. In addition to SB 1267, the Pennsylvania DOT established an Autonomous Vehicle Task Force of state, local, academic and industry leaders to advise the state on how to move forward with regulating and eventually deploying self-driving vehicles. The state also entered into a <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/transportation/3-States-form-Smart-Belt-Coalition-to-Collaborate-Autonomous-Vehicle-Development.html" target="_blank">multistate coalition</a> with Ohio and Michigan to support collaborative research, testing and policies.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Pennsylvania-Unveils-Guidelines-for-Autonomous-Vehicles.html" target="_blank">Pennsylvania Unveils Guidelines for Autonomous Vehicles</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Pennsylvania-Develops-Autonomous-Vehicles-Testing-Policy-Task-Force.html" target="_blank">Pennsylvania Develops Autonomous Vehicles Testing Policy Task Force</a>
|
||
"
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Rhode Island<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> South Carolina<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/bills/3289.htm" target="_blank">HB 3289</a> (2017) — South Carolina penned its first piece of legislation on automated driving, clearing regulations for minimum following distance for platooning vehicles.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> South Dakota<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Tennessee<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/109/Bill/SB0598.pdf" target="_blank">SB 598</a> (2015) — Tennessee wanted state control over autonomous vehicles. As a result, SB 598 forbade any local legislation banning the use of motor vehicles equipped with autonomous technology.
|
||
<p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/109/Bill/SB2333.pdf" target="_blank">SB 2333</a> (2016) — The state then legislated that autonomous vehicles can be equipped with an integrated electronic display visible to the operator while the motor vehicle's autonomous technology is engaged.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/109/Bill/SB1561.pdf" target="_blank">SB 1561</a> (2016) — This bill cleared up some ambiguity around the definitions of autonomous technology, driving mode and dynamic driving task.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/110/Bill/SB0676.pdf" target="_blank">SB 676</a> (2017) — With SB 676, Tennessee cleared the way for vehicle platooning research on streets and highways as long as companies disclose programs to the Department of Transportation and Department of Safety.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=SB0151" target="_blank">SB 151</a> (2017) — Also known as the “Automated Vehicles Act,” the state’s most far-reaching legislation establishes the requirements for autonomous vehicles to operate on public roads and highways. SB 151 modifies requirements for operator licensing, seatbelts, liability issues and crash reporting.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <s href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/10-Places-to-Watch-for-Autonomous-Vehicle-Developments.html?page=2">10 Places to Watch for Autonomous Vehicle Developments, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Tennessee-A-Leader-in-Self-Driving-Vehicle-Development.html" target="_blank">Tennessee a Leader in Self-Driving Vehicle Developments</a>
|
||
</s></p></div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Texas<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/85R/billtext/pdf/HB01791F.pdf#navpanes=0" target="_blank">HB 1791</a> (2017) — Legislates connected braking systems to allow for the platooning of vehicles.
|
||
<p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/85R/billtext/pdf/SB02205F.pdf#navpanes=0" target="_blank">SB 2205</a> (2017) — SB 2205 defines several terms related to autonomous vehicles. The bill also specifies licensing and permitting requirements, and pre-empts any local legislation on the industry. Texas also eliminated the need for a human driver to be present in the vehicle for operation.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</p></div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Utah<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://le.utah.gov/~2015/bills/static/HB0373.html" target="_blank">HB 373</a> (2015) — Utah passed legislation allowing for the Department of Transportation to conduct a connected vehicle technology testing program.
|
||
<p>
|
||
HB 280 (2016) — In passing HB 280, Utah called for a study on the effects of autonomous vehicles on the state and to evaluate the <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/automation/DOT-Lays-Out-Role-for-States-in-Regulating-Self-Driving-Cars.html" target="_blank">NHTSA</a> and <a href="https://le.utah.gov/interim/2016/pdf/00004126.pdf" target="_blank">AAMVA</a> standards and best practices.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</p></div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Vermont<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Documents/2018/Docs/BILLS/H-0494/H-0494%20As%20Passed%20by%20Both%20House%20and%20Senate%20Official.pdf" target="_blank">H 494 (2017)</a> — With H 494, Vermont required the department of transportation to create a body of interest groups that can discuss the impacts related to autonomous vehicles. The secretary of transportation is tasked with reporting the progress and recommendations from the committee to the Legislature.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Virginia<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Executive Order and Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> In June 2015, Gov. Terry McAuliffe <a href="https://governor.virginia.gov/newsroom/newsarticle?articleId=8526" target="_blank">announced the creation</a> of automated corridors totaling more than 70 miles of interstates and arterials. The state’s DOT and DMV partnered with the Virginia Tech Institute of Transportation to oversee the program.
|
||
<p>
|
||
<a href="http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?ses=161&typ=bil&val=hb454&submit=GO" target="_blank">HB 454 (2016)</a> — The state chose to pursue a more <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Virginia-Lawmakers-Take-Hands-Off-Approach-on-Autonomous-Vehicles-to-Encourage-Innovation.html" target="_blank">hands-off strategy</a> when it comes to autonomous vehicles, hoping lack of regulations would encourage innovation. The one piece of legislation passed allowed for visual displays being available while a car is operating autonomously.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/10-Places-to-Watch-for-Autonomous-Vehicle-Developments.html?page=2" target="_blank">10 Places to Watch for Autonomous Vehicle Developments</a>
|
||
</p></div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Washington<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Executive Order<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 2<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://governor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/exe_order/17-02AutonomouVehicles.pdf?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery" target="_blank">Executive Order 17-02</a> — Gov. Jay Inslee signed an executive order allowing companies to apply with the state Department of Licensing for permission, under pilot programs, to test-drive autonomous vehicles on state roads.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/automation/Washington-Governor-Signs-Order-for-Public-Autonomous-Vehicle-Testing.html" target="_blank">Washington Governor Signs Order for Public Autonomous Vehicle Testing</a>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Washington, D.C.<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://lims.dccouncil.us/Download/26687/B19-0931-SignedAct.pdf" target="_blank">2013 DC B 19-643</a> — Washington, D.C., defined several terms related to autonomous vehicles and addressed liability issues. The bill also regulates human drivers be present within the vehicle, ready to take over in case of emergency.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> West Virginia<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Wisconsin<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Executive Order<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 2<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="https://walker.wi.gov/sites/default/files/executive-orders/EO%20%23245.pdf" target="_blank">Executive Order 245</a> — Gov. Scott Walker formed the Steering Committee on Autonomous and Connected Vehicle Testing and Deployment, which is meant to advise the state on how to proceed with regulating self-driving vehicles. The order specifies the members of the committee, their duty to coordinate across state departments about jurisdiction, and make recommendations on registration, licensing and liability.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> None
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Wyoming<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Alaska<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> California<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_1251-1300/sb_1298_bill_20120925_chaptered.pdf" target="_blank">SB 1298</a> (2012) — The state passed legislation allowing the testing of driverless vehicles in 2012, and for the state DMV to issue testing permits for testing on public roads. In 2017, the DMV’s guidance was updated to no longer require a human driver behind the wheel.
|
||
<p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_1551-1600/ab_1592_bill_20160830_enrolled.pdf" target="_blank">AB 1592</a> (2016) — California passed a more localized bill exempting state AV rules for testing and piloting self-driving vehicles at the GoMentum Station under the guidance of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). CCTA has partnerships with private companies, including Honda, EasyMile and Uber’s Otto. GoMentum station was also selected as one of 10 designated proving grounds for autonomous vehicle research by the U.S. Department of Transportation.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/transportation/How-Cities-and-Automakers-See-Californias-Autonomous-Vehicle-Regulations.html" target="_blank">How Cities and Automakers See California's Autonomous Vehicle Regulations</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/3-Concerns-Automakers-Have-With-Californias-Autonomous-Vehicle-Regulations.html" target="_blank">3 Concerns Automakers Have with California's Autonomous Vehicle Rules</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/automation/California-DMV-Embraces-Fully-Driverless-Cars-in-Proposed-Rules.html" target="_blank">California DMV Embraces Fully Driverless Cars</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Driverless-Car-Testing-May-Spark-a-Tech-Transformation-for-One-California-Town.html">Driverless Car Testing May Spark a Tech Transformation for One California Town</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Driverless-Shuttle-Program-Kicks-Off-in-California-to-Tackle-First-MileLast-Mile-Mobility-Obstacle.html" target="_blank">Driverless Shuttle Program Kicks Off in California to Tackle First Mile/Last Mile Mobility Obstacle</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/transportation/U-S-DOT-Names-10-Proving-Ground-Sites-Testing-Autonomous-Vehicles.html" target="_blank">U.S. DOT Names 10 Proving Ground Sites Testing Autonomous Vehicles</a>
|
||
</p></div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Colorado<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="http://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2017A/bills/2017A_213_signed.pdf" target="_blank">SB 213</a> (2017) — Earlier this year, Colorado passed its first piece of legislation, defining “automated driving systems,” “dynamic driving tasks,” and “human operator” to allow for testing and operation within the state, as long as the vehicle complies with every state and federal law that applies to the function the system is operating. The bill also calls for the state DOT to report autonomous vehicle progress to the state legislature annually. The state DOT is well underway with the RoadX program, an initiative to increase safety and ease congestion on highways.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/Colorado-Pushes-for-Early-Stage-Vehicle-to-Vehicle-Vehicle-to-Infrastructure-Test-on-Mountain-Highways.html" target="_blank">Colorado Pushes for Early-Stage Vehicle-to-Vehicle, Vehicle-to-Infrastruture Test on Mountain Highways</a>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Connecticut<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="https://www.cga.ct.gov/asp/cgabillstatus/cgabillstatus.asp?selBillType=Bill&bill_num=SB00260&which_year=2017" target="_blank">SB 260
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/policy/Connecticut-House-Gives-Final-Legislative-Approval-to-Autonomous-Vehicle-Bill.html" target="_blank">Connecticut House Gives Final Legislative Approval to Autonomous Vehicle Bill</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/To-Get-in-Driverless-Car-Game-Connecticut-Must-Modernize-Motor-Vehicle-Statutes.html" target="_blank">To Get in the Driverless Car Game, Connecticut Must Modernize Motor Vehicle Statutes</a>
|
||
</a></div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Delaware<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> <br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 0<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> No known legislation or executive orders<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>State:</b> Florida<br>
|
||
<b>Type:</b> Legislation<br>
|
||
<b>Code:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>More Info:</b> <a href="https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2012/1207/BillText/er/PDF" target="_blank">HB 1207</a> (2012) — As one of the first and most open states for autonomous vehicle testing, Florida declared in 2012 its intent to encourage the safe development, testing and operation of AVs on public roads. The bill also directed the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to prepare a report recommending additional legislative or regulatory actions the state should pursue.<p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h0599er.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=0599&Session=2012" target="_blank">HB 599</a> (2012) — The relevant portions of this bill are identical to the substitute version of HB 1207.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h7027er.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=7027&Session=2016" target="_blank">HB 7027</a> (2016) — The renewed legislation eliminates the requirement that AV operation be done for testing purposes and that there be a human driver present during all AV operation.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
<a href="http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h7061er.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=7061&Session=2016" target="_blank">HB 7061</a> (2016) — Florida most recently passed legislation eliminating a provision within driving regulations to make way for platooning trucks.<br>
|
||
<b>Our Coverage:</b> <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/automation/Florida-Races-Toward-Widespread-Rollout-Self-Driving-Cars.html" target="_blank">Florida Races Toward Widespread Rollout of Self-Driving Cars</a>, <a href="http://www.govtech.com/fs/New-Legislation-Puts-Florida-in-Leadership-Role-for-Driverless-Cars.html" target="_blank">New Legislation Puts Florida in Leadership Role for Driverless Cars</a>
|
||
</p></div></td></tr></table></body></html> |