163 lines
7.3 KiB
HTML
163 lines
7.3 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
|
|
<title>Energy Rankings STATE GEO - Google Fusion Tables</title>
|
|
<style type="text/css">
|
|
html, body {
|
|
margin: 0;
|
|
padding: 0;
|
|
height: 100%;
|
|
}
|
|
</style></head>
|
|
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Alabama</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 43
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Alaska</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 38
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Arizona</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 17
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Arkansas</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 38
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>California</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 2
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Colorado</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 12
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Connecticut</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 8
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Delaware</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 31
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>District of Columbia</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 22
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Florida</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 27
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Georgia</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 36
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Hawaii</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 12
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Idaho</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 26
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Illinois</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 17
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Indiana</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 32
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Iowa</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 11
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Kansas</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 48
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Kentucky</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 37
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Louisiana</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 40
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Maine</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 12
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Maryland</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 10
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Massachusetts</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 1
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Michigan</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 17
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Minnesota</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 8
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Mississippi</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 49
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Missouri</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 44
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Montana</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 35
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Nebraska</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 40
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Nevada</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 22
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>New Hampshire</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 21
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>New Jersey</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 15
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>New Mexico</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 27
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>New York</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 3
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>North Carolina</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 27
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>North Dakota</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 51
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Ohio</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 24
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Oklahoma</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 47
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Oregon</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 4
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Pennsylvania</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 25
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Rhode Island</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 5
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>South Carolina</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 46
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>South Dakota</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 42
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Tennessee</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 30
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Texas</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 33
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Utah</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 17
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Vermont</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 5
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Virginia</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 34
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Washington</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 5
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>West Virginia</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 44
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Wisconsin</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 16
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif">
|
|
<h2>Wyoming</h2>
|
|
<b>Energy Efficiency Ranking:</b> 50
|
|
</div></td></tr></table></body></html> |