210 lines
11 KiB
HTML
210 lines
11 KiB
HTML
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
|
||
|
|
<title>Florida Senate Districts Population Change 2010 - Google Fusion Tables</title>
|
||
|
|
<style type="text/css">
|
||
|
|
html, body {
|
||
|
|
margin: 0;
|
||
|
|
padding: 0;
|
||
|
|
height: 100%;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
</style></head>
|
||
|
|
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 1<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 424,456<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -45,577<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -9.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 10<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 565,921<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +95,888<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 20.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 11<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 433,661<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -36,372<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -7.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 12<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 531,959<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +75,052<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 13.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 13<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 394,766<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -75,267<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -16%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 14<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 457,489<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -12,544<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -2.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 15<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 560,770<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +90,737<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 19.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 16<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 431,916<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -38,117<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -8.1%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 17<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 456,960<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -12,544<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -2.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 18<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 404,822<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -65,211<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -13.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 19<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 477,068<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +7,035<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 1.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 2<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 449,902<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -20,131<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -4.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 20<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 576,207<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +106,174<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 22.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 21<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 529,870<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +59,837<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 12.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 22<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 419,763<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -50,270<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -10.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 23<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 458,330<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -11,703<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -2.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 24<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 524,254<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +54,221<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 11.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 25<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 428,398<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -41,635<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -8.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 26<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 481,892<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +11,859<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 2.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 27<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 551,555<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +90,737<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 17.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 28<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 545,085<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +75,052<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 16%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 29<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 397,144<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -72,889<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 3<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 495,081<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +25,048<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 5.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 30<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 458,703<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -11,330<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -2.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 31<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 432,649<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -37,384<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 32<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 428,898<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -41,135<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -8.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 33<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 404,290<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -65,743<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -14%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 34<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 481,165<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +11,132<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 2.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 35<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 438,861<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -31,172<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -6.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 36<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 418,626<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -51,407<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -10.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 37<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 480,189<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +10,156<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 2.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 38<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 442,810<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -27,223<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -5.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 39<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 483,183<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +13,150<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 2.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 4<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 433,628<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -36,405<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -7.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 40<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 448,543<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -21,490<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -4.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 5<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 515,369<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +45,336<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 9.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 6<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 451,464<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -18,569<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 7<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 432,554<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> -37,479<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 8<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 525,674<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +55,641<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 11.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>District name:</b> Senate District 9<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 population:</b> 527,435<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 470,033:</b> +57,402<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 12.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr></table></body></html>
|