610 lines
33 KiB
HTML
610 lines
33 KiB
HTML
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
|
||
|
|
<title>Florida House Districts 2010 Change - Google Fusion Tables</title>
|
||
|
|
<style type="text/css">
|
||
|
|
html, body {
|
||
|
|
margin: 0;
|
||
|
|
padding: 0;
|
||
|
|
height: 100%;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
</style></head>
|
||
|
|
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 1<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 159,402<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +3,612<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 1.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 10<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 151,214<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -5,464<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -3.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 100<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 137,630<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -19,048<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -12.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 101<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 189,600<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +32,922<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 21%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 102<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 160,952<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +4,512<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 2.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 103<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 138,339<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -18,339<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -11.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 104<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 137,432<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -19,246<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -12.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 105<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 151,273<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -5,405<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -3.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 106<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 150,952<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -5,726<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -3.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 107<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 156,177<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -501<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -0.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 108<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 132,251<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -24,427<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 109<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 135,230<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -21,448<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -13.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 11<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 163,223<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +6,545<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 4.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 110<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 132,138<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -24,540<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 111<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 139,430<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -17,248<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -11%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 112<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 210,556<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +53,878<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 34.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 113<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 136,597<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -20,081<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -12.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 114<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 133,125<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -23,553<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 115<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 135,054<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -21,624<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -13.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 116<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 134,681<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -21,997<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -14%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 117<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 150,960<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -5,718<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -3.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 118<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 162,848<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +6,545<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 3.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 119<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 154,679<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -1,999<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -1.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 12<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 159,354<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +2,676<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 1.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 120<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 170,078<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +13,400<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 8.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 13<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 195,431<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +38,753<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 24.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 14<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 134,417<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -22,261<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -14.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 15<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 159,402<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -32,167<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -20.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 16<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 140,428<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -16,250<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -10.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 17<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 161,943<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +5,348<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 3.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 18<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 161,190<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +4,512<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 2.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 19<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 175,628<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +20,061<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 12.1%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 2<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 139,453<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -17,225<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -11%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 20<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 201,953<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +45,275<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 28.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 21<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 145,063<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -11,615<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -7.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 22<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 176,739<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +20,061<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 12.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 23<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 142,648<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -14,030<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 24<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 166,317<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +9,639<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 6.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 25<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 179,031<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +22,353<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 14.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 26<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 165,010<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +8,814<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 5.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 27<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 131,755<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -24,923<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 28<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 154,175<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -2,503<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -1.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 29<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 160,290<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +3,612<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 2.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 3<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 159,402<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -30,425<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -19.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 30<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 180,594<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +25,782<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 15.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 31<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 138,215<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -18,463<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -11.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 32<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 177,523<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +22,353<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 13.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 33<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 196,662<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +39,984<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 25.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 34<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 144,119<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -12,559<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 35<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 154,735<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -1,943<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -1.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 36<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 157,126<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +448<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 0.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 37<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 135,554<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -21,124<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -13.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 38<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 162,248<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +5,570<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 3.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 39<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 132,191<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -24,487<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 4<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 144,198<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -12,480<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 40<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 149,664<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -7,014<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -4.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 41<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 252,332<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +95,654<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 61.1%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 42<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 214,866<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +58,188<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 37.1%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 43<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 162,052<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +5,487<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 3.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 44<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 171,652<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +14,974<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 9.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 45<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 146,618<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -10,060<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -6.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 46<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 142,772<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -13,906<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -8.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 47<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 157,056<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +378<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 0.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 48<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 136,924<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -19,754<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -12.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 49<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 172,598<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +18,196<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 10.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 5<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 154,014<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -2,664<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -1.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 50<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 131,026<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -25,652<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -16.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 51<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 180,594<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -27,534<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -17.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 52<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 139,789<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -16,889<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -10.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 53<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 133,115<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -23,563<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 54<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 130,417<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -26,261<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -16.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 55<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 133,112<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -23,566<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 56<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 192,632<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +38,753<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 22.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 57<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 148,460<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -8,218<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -5.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 58<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 131,897<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -24,781<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 59<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 141,651<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -15,027<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -9.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 6<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 147,936<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -8,742<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -5.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 60<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 162,605<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +5,927<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 3.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 61<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 242,396<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +85,718<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 54.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 62<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 162,165<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +5,487<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 3.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 63<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 156,183<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -495<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -0.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 64<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 165,492<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +8,814<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 5.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 65<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 180,594<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +22,824<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 14.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 66<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 162,026<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +5,374<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 3.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 67<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 241,034<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +84,356<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 53.8%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 68<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 128,684<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -27,994<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -17.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 69<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 132,224<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -24,454<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 7<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 169,309<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +12,631<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 8.1%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 70<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 150,125<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -6,553<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -4.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 71<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 183,147<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +32,728<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 16.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 72<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 167,184<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +10,506<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 6.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 73<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 189,406<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +32,728<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 20.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 74<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 182,460<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +25,782<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 16.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 75<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 174,874<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +18,196<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 11.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 76<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 149,992<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -6,686<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -4.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 77<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 147,455<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -9,223<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -5.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 78<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 156,153<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -525<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -0.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 79<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 187,203<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +32,728<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 19.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 8<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 152,934<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -3,744<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -2.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 80<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 148,503<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -8,175<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -5.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 81<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 201,633<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +45,275<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 28.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 82<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 172,265<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +15,587<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 9.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 83<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 168,377<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +11,699<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 7.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 84<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 144,934<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -11,744<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -7.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 85<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 193,827<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +38,753<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 23.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 86<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 142,110<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -14,568<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -9.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 87<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 137,131<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -19,547<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -12.5%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 88<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 164,967<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +8,289<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 5.3%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 89<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 140,077<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -16,601<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -10.6%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 9<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 147,197<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -9,481<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -6.1%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 90<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 142,553<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -14,125<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 91<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 129,999<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -26,679<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -17%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 92<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 133,187<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -23,491<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -15%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 93<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 131,283<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -25,395<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -16.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 94<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 135,245<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -21,433<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -13.7%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 95<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 134,355<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -22,323<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -14.2%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 96<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 140,377<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -16,301<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -10.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 97<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 169,848<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> +13,400<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> 8.4%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 98<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 134,942<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -21,736<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -13.9%
|
||
|
|
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-info-window" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12px">
|
||
|
|
<b>Dist Name:</b> House District 99<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>2010 Population:</b> 137,645<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Difference from ideal population of 156,678: </b> -19,033<br>
|
||
|
|
<b>Percentage difference:</b> -12.1%
|
||
|
|
</div></td></tr></table></body></html>
|