460 lines
21 KiB
HTML
460 lines
21 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML><html><head>
|
||
<title>Best and Worst State Capitals - Google Fusion Tables</title>
|
||
<style type="text/css">
|
||
html, body {
|
||
margin: 0;
|
||
padding: 0;
|
||
height: 100%;
|
||
}
|
||
</style></head>
|
||
<body><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Austin, TX<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 65.43<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 11<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 2<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 18<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 2<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Lincoln, NE<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 65.34<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 4<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 8<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 20<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Bismarck, ND<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 64.73<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 10<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 6<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 42<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 4<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Madison, WI<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 63.78<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 26<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 12<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 8<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Raleigh, NC<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 62.42<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 19<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 23<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 6<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Boise, ID<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 61.07<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 9<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 24<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 11<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 14<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 7<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Montpelier, VT<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 60.18<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 25<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 15<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 4<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 19<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 8<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Pierre, SD<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 59.84<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 14<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 32<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 2<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 44<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 9<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Helena, MT<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 59.52<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 19<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 7<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 30<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 15<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 10<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Columbus, OH<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 59.38<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 12<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 14<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 10<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 22<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 11<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Des Moines, IA<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 58.7<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 8<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 19<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 14<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 27<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 12<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Olympia, WA<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 58.23<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 24<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 36<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 17<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 13<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Denver, CO<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 57.91<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 38<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 31<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 6<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 14<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Salt Lake City, UT<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 57.77<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 28<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 30<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 16<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 4<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 15<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Nashville, TN<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 57.46<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 21<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 4<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 25<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 28<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 16<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Atlanta, GA<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 57.18<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 31<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 33<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 13<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 17<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Cheyenne, WY<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 56.07<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 2<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 10<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 40<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 37<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 18<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Jefferson City, MO<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 55.41<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 6<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 22<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 35<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 34<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 19<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Annapolis, MD<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 55.26<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 34<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 18<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 27<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 10<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 20<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Topeka, KS<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 55.22<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 13<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 25<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 23<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 41<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 21<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Oklahoma City, OK<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 55.19<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 5<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 6<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 43<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 47<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 22<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Juneau, AK<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 53.9<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 27<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 17<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 20<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 46<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 23<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> St. Paul, MN<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 53.83<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 36<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 21<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 9<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 25<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 24<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Springfield, IL<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 53.39<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 1<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 31<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 42<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 38<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 25<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Concord, NH<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 52.93<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 41<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 11<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 8<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 45<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 26<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Columbia, SC<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 52.81<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 29<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 42<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 34<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 7<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 27<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Phoenix, AZ<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 52.5<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 22<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 27<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 33<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 32<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 28<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Tallahassee, FL<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 51.61<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 37<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 46<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 12<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 17<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 29<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Charleston, WV<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 50.98<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 7<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 13<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 49<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 48<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 30<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Lansing, MI<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 50.73<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 18<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 40<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 32<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 39<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 31<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Augusta, ME<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 50.7<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 39<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 23<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 28<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 29<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 32<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Santa Fe, NM<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 50.64<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 35<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 38<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 41<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 2<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 33<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Richmond, VA<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 50.56<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 33<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 26<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 46<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 12<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 34<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Indianapolis, IN<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 49.86<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 17<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 34<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 37<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 43<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 35<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Albany, NY<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 49.66<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 46<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 43<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 15<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 11<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 36<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Salem, OR<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 49.57<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 40<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 28<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 29<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 30<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 37<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Frankfort, KY<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 49.53<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 15<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 29<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 47<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 35<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 38<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Sacramento, CA<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 49.21<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 44<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 41<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 26<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 13<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 39<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Little Rock, AR<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 48.72<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 16<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 20<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 44<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 50<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 40<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Harrisburg, PA<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 48.65<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 42<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 39<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 36<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 9<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 41<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Boston, MA<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 47.54<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 48<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 16<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 7<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 16<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 42<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Baton Rouge, LA<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 46.83<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 30<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 35<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 45<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 36<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 43<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Dover, DE<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 46.81<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 32<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 44<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 39<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 26<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 44<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Honolulu, HI<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 46.35<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 50<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 9<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 18<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 3<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 45<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Trenton, NJ<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 45.6<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 43<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 50<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 22<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 33<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 46<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Providence, RI<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 44.54<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 47<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 37<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 24<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 21<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 47<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Jackson, MS<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 43.08<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 23<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 48<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 48<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 49<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 48<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Montgomery, AL<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 42.85<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 20<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 49<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 50<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 40<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr> <tr><td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 49<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Carson City, NV<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 42.03<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 45<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 47<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 38<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 24<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td> <td><div class="googft-card-view" style="font-family:sans-serif;width:450px;padding:4px;border:1px solid #ccc;overflow:hidden">
|
||
<b>Overall Rank:</b> 50<br>
|
||
<b>City:</b> Hartford, CT<br>
|
||
<b>State Capital Index:</b> 39.47<br>
|
||
<b>‘Affordability’ Rank:</b> 49<br>
|
||
<b>‘Economic Well-Being’ Rank:</b> 45<br>
|
||
<b>‘Education & Health’ Rank:</b> 21<br>
|
||
<b>‘Quality of Life’ Rank:</b> 31<br>
|
||
<b>Icon:</b>
|
||
</div></td></tr></table></body></html> |